11.A.
Joint Meeting - City of Vero Beach and Indian River County
Recommended Action:
Review, discuss and approve the topics for discussion with the City of Vero Beach
County Administrator John Titkanich announced that the next joint meeting with the
City of Vero Beach will be held on October 24th, from 2 p.m. to 4 p.m., at the
County Main Library. The proposed topics will cover utilities, service territory, plan
capacity, septic to sewer, park recreation opportunities, and potential acquisition of
services. Other topics may include roadways, Building Department, Fire Marshall,
and regional growth impact.
Commissioner Moss requested that if there was extra time during the joint meeting,
could a discussion be had regarding the County lobbyist's matters in Tallahassee that
would affect both parties in the interest of good governance and intergovernmental
cooperation.
Vice Chairman Adams pointed out that the County had always worked
collaboratively with lobbyists and advocates whenever issues affected the City and the
County. She believed that having more people advocating, whether for an
appropriation or a policy change, would be helpful. However, she expressed concern
about adding this to the official agenda because the conversation had not been had
with the City of Sebastian. She did not want the other Municipalities to feel like this
was a unique relationship between the County and the City of Vero Beach. Ms.
Adams cautioned that when items were added specifically to the agenda, it may
appear that the County would only do this with Vero Beach, but not with Sebastian or
Fellsmere. She believed this topic was already covered under the umbrella policy of
working together as a community.
Commissioner Flescher questioned why the County would raise an issue with one
municipality when the County had not done so in the past. He stated the County had a
good relationship with the Sheriff's Office and Fire Marshalls and a great
inter-relationship with municipalities. He asserted it was unnecessary to include these
topics on the agenda. He further stated he was hesitant about presenting our lobbyist
as a topic for discussion with the city where the County had not had that conversation
with other municipalities.
Chairman Earman agreed to work collaboratively on fundamental issues for citizens'
betterment and to discuss legislative issues in future special call meetings.
A motion was made by Commissioner Flescher, seconded by Chairman Earman,
to approve staff's recommendation. The motion carried by the following vote:
5 -
Aye:
Chairman Earman, Vice Chairman Adams, Commissioner Flescher, Commissioner
Loar, and Commissioner Moss