Indian River County

Administration Complex

1801 27th Street

Indian River County, Florida

Vero Beach, Florida 32960

indianriver.gov

Meeting Minutes - Final

Board of County Commissioners

Joseph Flescher, District 2, Chairman

Deryl Loar, District 4, Vice Chairman

Susan Adams, District 1

Joseph H. Earman, District 3

Laura Moss, District 5

John A. Titkanich, Jr., County Administrator

Jennifer W. Shuler, County Attorney

Ryan L. Butler, Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller

Wednesday, July 9, 2025

9:00 AM

Commission Chambers

Budget Workshop

1. CALL TO ORDER

5 -

Present:

Chairman Joseph Flescher

Vice Chairman Deryl Loar

Commissioner Susan Adams

Commissioner Joe Earman

Commissioner Laura Moss

2.A. A MOMENT OF SILENT REFLECTION FOR FIRST RESPONDERS AND MEMBERS OF

THE ARMED FORCES

2.B. INVOCATION

Commissioner Susan Adams

3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman

4. GENERAL OVERVIEW SESSION

Chairman Flescher announced a public hearing on the Solid Waste Disposal District

(SWDD) at 1:30 p.m. The Budget Workshop meeting would be temporarily

suspended to address a Special Assessment Resolution for the SWDD. Additionally,

during the Budget Workshop meeting, a three-minute speaking limit would be in effect

for anyone wishing to discuss budgetary items.

John A. Titkanich, Jr., County Administrator

25-0720

Attachments: Budget Message

County Administrator John Titkanich opened the Budget Workshop by

discussing the challenges of creating the Fiscal Year 2025/2026 budget in an

uncertain economic climate. He expressed concerns about a possible

economic slowdown and upcoming reforms that could affect local government

funding. With a significant decline in real estate values impacting revenue from

building permits and new construction, he emphasized the importance of fiscal

prudence to ensure the County could maintain essential services. The

proposed budget totaled $597,623,132, reflecting a 10.9% decrease from

the previous year’s amended budget but marking a 13.9% increase compared

to last year’s approved budget. Major highlights included an 8.8% rise in the

Countywide Tax Roll and a $14.6 million funding request from the Sheriff's

Department. Additionally, costs for retirement increased by $4,199,834,

excluding Constitutional Officers, and Workers' Compensation increased by

$1,078,523, excluding Constitutional Officers, accompanied by a

recommendation to add 26 full-time positions. Administrator Titkanich

discussed tax reform, including a proposed reduction in sales tax, as well as

the repeal of the business rent tax and local option sales tax. The estimated

impacts to the following funds were anticipated: Optional Sales Tax ($1.5

million) and General and MSTU funds ($383,971). He voiced concern about

potential rollbacks and exemptions, particularly regarding a proposed

Homestead Exemption. Administrator Titkanich stated that the Office of

Management & Budget would report revenue trends at their quarterly

meetings and evaluate any necessary budget adjustments.

5. GENERAL FUND

001-101

001-102

001-103

001-107

001-109

001-112

001-113

001-118

001-119

001-201

001-202

001-203

001-204

001-206

001-208

001-210

001-211

001-212

001-215

001-216

001-220

001-229

001-230

001-237

001-238

001-241

001-246

001-249

001-250

001-251

001-283

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

COUNTY ATTORNEY

GIS TRANSFER

COMMUNICATIONS/EMERGENCY SERVICE

MAIN LIBRARY

NORTH COUNTY LIBRARY

BRACKETT LIBRARY

IRC SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION

LAW LIBRARY

ADMINISTRATOR - OPERATIONS

COMMUNITY SERVICES

HUMAN RESOURCES

PLANNING

VETERANS SERVICE

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT

PARKS

HUMAN SERVICES

AG EXTENSION

CONSERVATION LANDS

PROCUREMENT

FACILITIES MANAGEMENT

OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET

FACILITIES & FLEET SERVICES

FPL GRANT EXPENDITURES

EMERGENCY BASE GRANT

IS/TELECOM TRANSFER

INSURANCE PREMIUMS

ANIMAL SERVICES

COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL

MAILROOM/SWITCHBOARD

LAGOON

25-0721

Attachments: General Fund

County Administrator Titkanich provided an overview of the General Fund's financial

metrics, highlighting a significant increase in taxable value from $29.2 million to $31.8

million. This included $606.9 million from new construction, representing a 9.56%

decrease compared to the previous year’s figure of $665 million. He recommended

maintaining the millage rate at 3.5475 mills for the sixth consecutive year, which was

one of the lowest rates in the State of Florida. The projected ad valorem revenue for

fiscal year 2026 was set at $194.6 million.

The Land Acquisition Bond related to voter-approved environmental debt decreased

from 0.0639 mills to 0.0610 mills, resulting in a slight reduction in the countywide

millage subtotal. The Municipal Service Taxing Unit (MSTU) rate of 1.1506 mills and

the Emergency Service District rate of 2.3531 mills were proposed to remain

unchanged, leading to a minor overall reduction in the aggregate millage.

A breakdown of General Fund expenses was shown, revealing that 72.4% of these

expenses were state-mandated, covering essential services such as Administration, the

State Attorney's Office, the Public Defender's Office, the Guardian ad Litem (GAL)

program, and the Medical Examiner. The State funds these services, and the County

pays a proportionate share for the services that residents receive from these state

agencies. Notably, the Sheriff’s Office alone accounted for 52.3% of these expenses.

Revenue sources were primarily comprised of 39.5% from taxes, with other sources

and charges for services making up the remainder. The remaining expenses accounted

for approximately 27.6%. Based on these figures, $149,921,000, or 60% of the

General Fund, was allocated to fund the Constitutional Officers.

The unincorporated residents previously paid an MSTU of $338.55, with a proposal

to increase it to $350.44. This translated to an increase of $11.89, or 3.51%. For the

entire unincorporated area, overall taxes increased from $2,093.55 to a

recommended $2,166.15, reflecting a total increase of $72.60, or 3.47%.

In relation to property values, the Save Our Homes program allowed the value of

homesteaded properties to increase by either 3% or the rate of inflation, whichever

was lower.

Examining the General Fund overview, the projected increase in ad valorem tax roll

was estimated at 8.8%, resulting in approximately $8.68 million in additional revenue,

assuming a 95% collection rate at the same millage rate. Historical trends indicated

that this collection rate was likely to remain consistent.

The millage rate remained unchanged from the previous year, at 3.5475.

Constitutional officers experienced an added cost of $4,692.64, representing a 5.2%

increase. Additionally, funding for Children's Services was projected to rise by

$421,144, or 13.8%, a figure based on an increase in value from the prior year,

which reflected a one-year lag.

Moreover, the State-Mandated retirement rate saw an increase affecting all areas,

including Constitutional Offices, amounting to $2,567,074, or 17.5%. The Workers’

Compensation rate related to the General Fund was expected to increase by 27.9%,

resulting in approximately $337,444, excluding Constitutional Offices.

In terms of staffing, plans included adding a net of 9.25 additional full-time positions.

Of these, 1.25 positions were associated with a Constitutional Office, while the

remaining eight fell under the Board of County Commissioners’ Administration

Department, with a total cost of $744,217.

Administrator Titkanich continued the presentation by highlighting line items on the

General Fund expenses and budget adjustments across departments.

- The Human Resources budget increased by 6.1% due to rising personnel costs.

- The Board of County Commissioners budget decreased by 22.8% after removing a

$400,000 allocation for the Humiston Boardwalk.

- The County Attorney's Office budget rose by 2.3% due to the transfer of a land

Acquisition Specialist funded by multiple sources.

- The Emergency Services Communication department saw a reduction by 44.1%

after completing microwave system upgrades.

- The Main Library faced budget cuts and decreased by 7.2%, and the North County

Library's budget decreased by 2.4%.

- Community Services increased by 14.1% to support additional salaries and benefits,

following reduced funding from the State Housing Initiative Program.

- Veteran Services reported increased part-time salary and benefits for a Veteran

Service Officer, with plans to expand services and improve efficiency.

- Animal Control increased to 8.3% or $87,000, for a total of $1.3 million. The

contract with the Humane Society was set to expire, and Animal Control Officers

were frustrated with the limited capacity and service issues they faced when handling

calls for feral or wild animals.

The total for the General Fund expensed for this year was $33,813,939, with a

proposed increase of $1.7 million to reach $35,520,722, a 5% rise.

6. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS

25-0722

Attachments: Constitutionals

County Administrator Titkanich continued the presentation, outlining the proposed

budgets for all Constitutional Officers, totaling $98,862,218, which represented a

6.1% increase over the previous year's initial budget.

The Property Appraiser's request for the fiscal year was $5,638,119, which marked

an increase of $348,101 from last year's budget of $5.29 million. This allocation

included provisions for employee raises.

The Clerk of Circuit Court submitted a budget request that reflected a modest 2.3%

increase, raising their budget from $1,526,345 to $1,561,100, an increase of

$34,755. This additional funding was intended to accommodate cost-of-living

adjustments and support 1.25 new full-time positions, as well as criminal justice

financing software.

For the Tax Collector's budget, which was due on August 1, 2025, staff estimated a

significant 10.4% increase, amounting to approximately $448,823, bringing the total

budget from $4.29 million to $4.74 million.

Supervisor of Elections requested a 6.9% increase of $155,736, raising their budget

from $2.26 million to $2.42 million, primarily driven by the need for an additional GIS

specialist and rising costs associated with new legislation.

The Value Adjustment Board’s budget was also set to increase from $64,809 to

$70,000, reflecting additional costs for contractual services for outside legal

assistance.

He noted that the Sheriff's current budget was $78,911,955, with a recommended

increase to $83,646,672, which amounted to $4.734 million or a 6% increase.

The Chairman called for a recess at 9:49 a.m. and reconvened the meeting at 10:05

a.m. with all members present.

Property Appraiser Wesley Davis acknowledged the County's financial challenges but

highlighted his success in maintaining a steady workforce of 39 full-time employees

since 2010, despite budget cuts. The budget was fully funded for current positions,

with an emphasis on leveraging technology and managing rising contract costs. Mr.

Davis anticipated returning nearly $300,000 to the County at fiscal year-end and

maintained a cautious hiring approach based on available talent.

Chairman Flescher commended Mr. Davis for his innovative and fiscally responsible

strategies that have preserved departmental efficiency without overburdening

taxpayers. Commissioner Earman noted the successful collaboration between county

staff and the Property Appraiser's office, citing a reduction in public inquiries about

tax bills since 2020 as a sign of progress.

Clerk of Circuit Court and Comptroller Ryan Butler noted his budget proposal

reflected cost reductions achieved through collaboration with the County’s IT

department. Despite this, the Clerk’s office faced ongoing IT funding challenges due

to state mandates that financially burden counties. Diminishing surpluses from IT trust

funds indicated that by 2028, counties may need to fully fund their IT needs.

However, an increase in surpluses this year offered some hope for temporary relief.

Supervisor of Elections Leslie Swan emphasized the importance of collaboration in

maintaining election integrity in Indian River County amid rapid growth. A fourth Early

Voting site would be added at the Intergenerational Recreation Center (iG), with

funding included for voting equipment and supplies. The budget also accounted for

hiring a Geographic Information System (GIS) specialist to manage electoral maps. A

new law, House Bill 1201, significantly increased the costs of notifying individuals

about valid initiative petitions.

Administrator Titkanich provided an overview of the Sheriff's Office budget history,

highlighting the Board's allocation of $21,865,155 over the previous four years to

support Law Enforcement, Corrections, and Court Services. The Sheriff had

requested a budget of $14.6 million, which was deemed unattainable. Administrator

Titkanich recommended a budget increase to $83,646,672 and ruled out raising the

millage rate due to state initiatives aimed at lowering property taxes. The presentation

showed that without new revenue, substantial budget cuts and service reductions

would be insufficient to meet the Sheriff's request. The proposed budget for the

Sheriff’s Office accounted for 52.3% of the overall budget. The slides also highlighted

the current millage rates allocated to the Sheriff's Office and other County services.

Administrator Titkanich provided an overview of the Sheriff’s budget request for

2025/2026, highlighting several key points regarding personnel and operational

expenses.

Training expenses: $141,554 or 46.75% requested increase for a total training budget

of $444,314

Operational Expenses Breakdown: The total requested increase in operating expenses

was $4,812,441 or 32.88% of the total increase. Individual categories saw significant

increases, including:

- Contracted services: $2,778,243 (30.2%)

- Operating supplies: $1,084,677 (37.47%)

- Operating equipment: $363,261 (148.47%)

Travel/Transporting Prisoners: $126,393 requested increase, totaling $589,490,

noting that FY 24/25 expenses to date were $206,977.

He stated that this information pointed to significant increases in various budget

categories. He noted there were discrepancies in the Sheriff’s calculations and a need

for clarification regarding anticipated versus actual attendance for training and travel.

Chairman Flescher emphasized the need for a balanced approach that considered the

entire community’s needs, advocating for support of the Sheriff’s office while

remaining within practical budget limits and opposing tax increases.

Sheriff Flowers addressed the financial challenges facing his office, emphasizing the

overtime costs associated with staffing shortages. He proposed increasing starting

salaries for deputies as a necessary step for recruitment and retention. Additionally, he

pointed out that current personnel funds only covered salaries, leaving operational

expenses inadequately funded.

Sheriff Flowers referenced Florida Statute Section 30.49, Chapter 4, indicating that if

the Board decided to decrease his funding request, they would be required to provide

a detailed written notice of any proposed changes to his budget. He spotlighted the

soaring operational costs, ranging from essential items like tires to healthcare in the jail

and meals, insisting that law enforcement should never have been a last priority in

budget considerations. He passionately argued that without proper funding, every

aspect of the operation would inevitably falter.

He also noted the presence of community members at the meeting, who sought to

address critical issues. Sheriff Flowers confidently asserted that if he had mismanaged

funds, his staff would have held him accountable. He concluded by reiterating his

request for written details on any cuts to his budget should the Board decide to

support an amount differing from his proposed budget, emphasizing the necessity of

clarity and transparency in prioritizing public safety.

A discussion among Commissioner Adams, Sheriff's Office CFO Ms. Aimee Cooper,

and Sheriff Flowers examined the allocation of $770,000 for training. Ms. Cooper

pointed out that this amount included a $119,000 increase in overtime related to

training and a $256,000 adjustment to the sworn officer pay scale. Commissioner

Adams sought clarification to determine whether this allocation represented an

increase of $29,000 per deputy, for a total of 26 deputies. Additionally, the

conversation aimed to clarify how the training wage budget was allocated to provide

additional wages for the deputies.

Sheriff Flowers recommended that Ms. Cooper have a brief meeting with Budget

Director Kristin Daniels to review the relevant spreadsheet. In order to address these

questions more effectively.

Commissioner Adams sought clarification on the Sheriff's budget statements, noting

possible inconsistencies in funding for raises over the past four years. She referenced

State Statute 30.49, Chapter 12 which allowed the Sheriff to transfer budget funds

after approval, raising concerns about transparency. Commissioner Adams highlighted

the need for a clear understanding of salary increases, questioning the sustainability of

last year’s 5.8% raise and the justification for a 14% increase this year. She

emphasized the importance of understanding budget proposals to prevent

discrepancies between intended outcomes and actual results.

Due to time constraints, Chairman Flescher proposed that the Board move on to the

Municipal Service Taxing Unit (M.S.T.U.) and postpone the discussion with the

Sheriff until after the lunch recess. This would allow Ms. Cooper and staff to review

the allocations in question during that time.

[Clerk's note: After reconvening at 2:00 p.m. discussion resumed with the

Sheriff's budget and was placed here for continuity.]

Chairman Flescher stated that before the meeting was suspended, concerns had been

raised about discrepancies in budget figures between the Sheriff's Office and the

Office of Management and Budget. Sheriff Flowers acknowledged an issue with the

classification of crossing guards as full-time instead of part-time, which led to an

estimated budget overstatement of about $8 million. He stressed that the information

they had provided was accurate from their perspective and noted differences in how it

had been interpreted when compared to the County Administrator's spreadsheets.

Sheriff's office CFO Aimee Cooper pointed out that the numbers on the County

Administrator's spreadsheet had legitimate differences. This included discrepancies in

positions between fiscal year 2025 and fiscal year 2026. The numbers provided were

accurate and reflected the differences between those two years. She suggested that

they might have been looking for a simple average of the differences based on the

number of positions. While they might not have reached the same target, that did not

imply that the numbers themselves were inaccurate.

Sheriff Flowers expressed strong dissatisfaction, reiterating that he had requested $14

million for the budget, emphasizing the importance of public safety and the rising costs

of operational necessities. He criticized the ongoing budget discussions as ineffective,

asserting there were zero new positions in his budget and stressed the need to retain

current staff. Sheriff Flowers stated that he would be forced to make cuts, which

would hinder the department's ability to address community concerns effectively. He

insisted that past budgeting practices had not met the needs of the Sheriff's Office and

called for a more substantial financial commitment to support public safety initiatives.

Further discussion centered on the County Administrator's proposal to increase

deputy salaries from $50,000 to approximately $59,381, in order to match the pay of

firefighters. A suggested average raise of $3,500 for civilian employees was deemed

insufficient and rejected by the Sheriff. The Sheriff emphasized the critical need for

adequate salary funding due to financial difficulties faced by staff.

Chairman Flescher invited public comment.

The following people spoke:

Renee Reya

Lisa Boisvert

Catherine Gipson

James Dick

Serenity Marsh

Steve Aguirre

Michael Marsh

Lydia Davis

Paul Zelno

Tony Consalo

Baris Fanning

Thomas Lowther

Bob Sunkel

Bob Lindsay

Dr. Angela Jones

Trinity Marsh

Gordon Michael

Matt Redstone

Paul Godier

Joan Johnson

Deputy Park

John Clark

John Tobaya

There was a strong consensus among community members and former law

enforcement officials regarding the urgent need to improve compensation and support

for the Indian River County Sheriff's Office and its civilian staff. Many residents,

students, and local leaders voiced their support for increased funding for the Sheriff,

underscoring the crucial role these resources play in maintaining public safety.

Concerns were raised about how funding was prioritized, particularly regarding the

allocation of resources to non-essential expenditure such as Sandridge Golf Course

and the Chamber of Commerce, rather than the salaries of Deputies, who play a vital

role in ensuring community safety. Several speakers cautioned that neglecting the

budgetary needs of the Sheriff's Office could spark a workforce crisis, jeopardizing

both safety and operational effectiveness. This situation could lead to a mass

departure of Deputies seeking better pay elsewhere. Community members expressed

concerns about the welfare of law enforcement personnel and the impact of budget

decisions on public safety. They emphasized the need for fair compensation,

recognition of the contributions made by civilian staff, and sufficient support for law

enforcement. The speakers urged a reevaluation of budget priorities to ensure

sufficient funding for both law enforcement and community programs, highlighting the

importance of these measures for the safety and well-being of both personnel and the

communities they serve.

Chairman Flescher remarked that it had been suggested that the Board had not

adequately addressed needs over the years. He, however, had a very different

memory and a strong recall of what had occurred during the last few budget cycles, in

the interest of public awareness and for the benefit of the Board, as well as those who

spoke. He requested that the County Administrator review the numbers that had been

tracked over the past few years, specifically regarding the sheriff's salaries. He noted

that the Sheriff had the discretion to allocate the budget as he saw fit and was not

required to direct funds strictly to where they were requested. Therefore, within his

approved budget, he could make adjustments.

In response to the public's feedback, Administrator Titkanich discussed the golf

clubhouse at Sandridge, which operated as an exclusive, self-sustaining business

funded solely by golfers. Additionally, he pointed out that the funding for the Chamber

of Commerce included a $1 million allocation, alongside an additional $350,000

designated for Sebastian. Moreover, $2.3 million collected from Tourist Development

Taxes supported various tourism initiatives. Recent changes in legislation may have

opened the door for utilizing these funds for lifeguard services at County beaches,

which could save about $1.2 million over the following two years.

In response to Chairman Flescher, County Administrator Titkanich discussed the

Sheriff's office budget and salary trends for 2022-2025, highlighting a significant

funding increase from $57.8 million to $79.6 million. For the 2023-2024 fiscal year,

civilians received a 5% raise, while details for sworn personnel remained uncertain

due to the implementation of a new pay step plan. Concerns arose about sustaining

budget increases, particularly since expected tax revenue growth did not meet the

Sheriff's request.

To manage costs, Administrator Titkanich proposed a multiplier for expenses

associated with sworn officers, resulting in about $6.1 million needed to address

salary concerns. Strategies to mitigate costs included deferring capital expenses and

trimming specific budget items, such as funding for the animal shelter. However, this

potentially would result in safety concerns for the community. Additionally, Road

Maintenance, which would not be able to address the backlog being experienced. He

also discussed the Mental Health Court's funding needs, suggesting collaboration with

human services while emphasizing the importance of maintaining mental health services

to alleviate pressure on the criminal justice system.

Administrator Titkanich addressed the topic of the 28 County positions under

discussion, noting that five of these positions were funded by the General Fund, while

the others were supported by various funds and not through ad valorem taxes. He

emphasized that it would not be appropriate for utility customers to fund a general

fund employee, nor was it fair to use the general fund to supplement the sheriff's

funding. He pointed out that residents in unincorporated areas and MSTUs were

already paying for services provided outside their regions, creating a need for a

balancing act in funding decisions.

Administrator Titkanich expressed optimism about rounding up the funding to $6.1

million but maintained a cautious approach, considering the Sheriff's substantial

operational demands. The proposed increases warranted careful evaluation, as some

were significant enough that their implications were clear at a glance, without requiring

a detailed examination.

Administrator Titkanich highlighted growing concerns over the past three years

regarding whether these funding increases would translate into employee raises. Two

years prior, he had addressed these concerns by agreeing to $5.7 million increase,

with the Sheriff's assurance that there would be no reversal of that commitment.

Feedback from the community at that time indicated clear support for the Board’s

decision, entrusting the Sheriff to manage the allocated funds as promised. He noted

that the exceptional provision allowing fund transfers within the Sheriff's Office did not

extend to other Constitutional offices.

When discussing reserves, Administrator Titkanich clarified that the belief in having

$600 million was mistaken. The combined total from the MSTU and the General

Fund was approximately $102.5 million, with a significant portion restricted,

non-spendable, or committed, leaving only a small amount unassigned. He compared

the situation to continually withdrawing from a savings account, warning that

prolonged usage of reserves could lead to severe service cuts, as had happened in

other communities across the state.

Administrator Titkanich discussed preparations for the future, particularly the years

2027 and 2028. While he acknowledged ongoing residential developments and new

construction projects, he noted that building permit revenues had decreased by

approximately 19%, alongside a decline in impact fees. He stressed that expert

economic forecasts had not accounted for potential changes in how the State

Legislature and the Governor might alter local funding mechanisms, with factors such

as tariffs adding to financial uncertainties. He stated that preparedness was essential,

which justified the allocation set aside to avert issues encountered in the past. He

noted that an initial funding request had fallen short, but an additional $1.3 million had

been secured beyond the original recommendation, although this amount was still

considered inadequate.

Administrator Titkanich mentioned that raising salaries to $60,000 would be

achievable with a budget of $6,079,000. He proposed a salary increase of $9,381,

applying a multiplier to cover benefits, and estimated approximately $5.28 million for

sworn officers and $831,000 for civilian positions. Overall, he acknowledged the

complexities in addressing these salary needs without delving into specific line items of

the Sheriff's budget.

Chairman Flescher highlighted the significant funding allocated to the Sheriff's Office

over the past three years, amounting to nearly $18.92 million. He discussed the

Sheriff's focus on addressing issues like pay compression, starting salaries, and

cost-of-living adjustments for law enforcement personnel. Chairman Flescher

acknowledged the challenge of retaining staff due to competition from other

jurisdictions, emphasizing the need for a strategic plan to improve salaries while also

considering the local economy. He voiced concerns about changing the millage rate,

suggesting that it would negatively impact the community, and called for alternative

solutions to enhance compensation for law enforcement to retain experienced

individuals.

Vice Chairman Loar raised concerns about the employee benefit package, specifically

regarding health insurance. Administrator Titkanich confirmed that health insurance

costs per employee had remained stable for several years and highlighted the

competitive nature of their package, which included vision and dental care, long-term

disability benefits, and access to a free employee health clinic for basic care and

prescriptions. Vice Chairman Loar also addressed concerns about salary

compression issues, stating that there would be no such issue since each grade would

receive an additional $10,000. He emphasized that the formula used for salary

adjustments had been generous, proposing a $10,000 increase for sworn law

enforcement and a $3,500 increase for civilians, all without raising the millage rate.

Sheriff Flowers expressed frustration over ongoing underfunding, noting that public

dissatisfaction was increasing due to the neglect of key community issues like traffic

management and safety. His anger escalated as he emphatically made his points

before walking out in exasperation.

Commissioner Moss inquired about the timeline for finalizing the budget, specifically

regarding the setting of the millage rates necessary for tax notices. Administrator

Titkanich responded that the deadline would be September 10, 2025. He explained

that while the millage could be lowered, it could not be increased once set.

Commissioner Moss expressed concern about rising property values leading to tax

increases, particularly for individuals on fixed incomes, and highlighted the additional

financial burden from increased water and sewer rates. She acknowledged the

importance of maintaining essential services but emphasized the challenges faced by

those on fixed incomes. Commissioner Moss reflected positively on Sheriff Flowers'

previous initiatives and performance since taking office in 2020. She expressed a

desire to identify additional areas within the budget where spending could be reduced

to further support the sheriff's budget, showing commitment to both fiscal

responsibility and public safety.

Commissioner Earman raised concerns about low starting salaries for law

enforcement personnel, noting that, despite budget increases over four years, starting

pay remained stagnant at $50,000. He compared this to rising salaries in fire rescue,

which reached $60,000 for Paramedics. Commissioner Earman expressed

disappointment that salary compression issues had not been adequately addressed

and questioned where the budget increase had been allocated. He highlighted the

difficulty in securing taxpayer support for budget increases and emphasized the need

for a structured approach to salary adjustments. Commissioner Earman concluded by

advocating for higher wages and the importance of collaboration in finding solutions.

The Chairman called for a recess at 3:56 p.m. and reconvened at 4:06 p.m. with all

members present.

Chairman Flescher emphasized his commitment to supporting law enforcement

personnel and acknowledged the Sheriff's identification of three critical issues that

need to be addressed. He noted that it would be more effective to tackle these issues

one at a time to avoid complications. Chairman Flescher praised the Sheriff for

managing compensation and prioritizing law enforcement needs while considering the

broader impact on the community of over 170,000 citizens. He expressed optimism

about collaboration between the Sheriff and the County Administrator, and reminded

everyone of the upcoming budget hearings. Commissioner Flescher emphasized the

importance of proactive discussions and finding solutions without increasing the

millage rate, although he acknowledged the challenge of meeting the request for over

$14 million. He mentioned that while achieving this might be difficult, progress could

still be made. He concluded by emphasizing the Board's commitment to ensuring first

responders were supported.

7. MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT (M.S.T.U.)

004-104

004-105

004-108

004-115

004-116

004-161

004-204

004-205

004-207

004-231

004-400

NORTH COUNTY AQUATIC CENTER

GIFFORD AQUATIC CENTER

RECREATION

INTERGENERATIONAL FACILITY

BEACH PARKS

SHOOTING RANGE

PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT

COUNTY PLANNING

CODE ENFORCEMENT

NATURAL RESOURCES

TAX COLLECTOR

25-0723

Attachments: MSTU Fund

County Administrator Titkanich presented the Municipal Service Taxing Unit (MSTU)

budget, which covers the unincorporated area of Indian River County.

Administrator Titkanich provided the millage history for the MSTU. He recommended

maintaining the millage rate at 1.1506 mills, which was the same as the previous year's

rate for the sixth consecutive year. Notably, this rate was 6.09% higher than the

rollback rate. Although the millage rate was recommended to remain unchanged, it

was legally considered a tax increase. In summary, the total expenses for the MSTU

department decreased by $1,734,079 or 12.7%.

8. TRANSPORTATION FUND

111-214

111-243

111-244

111-245

111-281

ROAD AND BRIDGE

PUBLIC WORKS

COUNTY ENGINEERING

TRAFFIC ENGINEERING

STORMWATER

25-0724

Attachments: Transportation

Administrator Titkanich provided an overview of the Transportation Budget,

highlighting the challenges related to rising costs, particularly in retirement expenses.

Workers' Compensation costs were projected to increase by $55,306 or 13.5%.

Along with retirement costs $15,801 or 1.1%.

The Gas Tax Revenue stood at $2, 656,000, showing a decline of about 1.1% or

$29,000.

Transfers from the General Fund and MSTU fund accounted for 77.2% of the total

revenue and were expected to increase by $1,028,839, or 5.1%. Funded expenses

covered essential areas, including Road and Bridge maintenance, Public Works,

County Engineering, Traffic Engineering, and Stormwater Management.

Collaborating closely with various departments, the total funding allocated for all

transportation-related departments was projected to decrease from $27,091,654 to

$25,254,518, marking a reduction of $1.837,136 or 6.8%.

9. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT

114-120

114-240

FIRE RESCUE

LIFE SAFETY

25-0725

Attachments: Emergency Services

Administrator Titkanich reviewed the Emergency Services District (ESD), noting an

8.6% increase in the ad valorem tax, which was projected to raise $4,627,408 with a

millage rate remaining at 2.3531, unchanged for the fifth consecutive year. Three new

Captain positions at $372,997 were being funded mainly through a Core Grant for the

first two years, while retirement contributions to the Florida Retirement System (FRS)

were expected to rise by $1,509,544, or 15.2%.

The overall budget decreased by 11.9%, with salaries and benefits set to increase by

6.5% and 9.4%, respectively. Capital expenditure dropped significantly by 80.1%,

though $3,758,153 was still allocated for projects. The total Fire Rescue budget

decreased from $83,019,519 to $73,051,810.

10. NON-DEPARTMENTAL STATE AGENCIES

25-0726

Attachments: State Agencies

County Administrator Titkanich reported on the recent budget requests received from

various agencies. He stated he had held meetings with multiple stakeholders, including

the Court Administrator, who provided insights regarding the Guardian ad Litem

program, the Victim's Assistance Program, the State Attorney, the Public Defender,

and the Medical Examiner. Each agency submitted its budget for examination. The

Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council also submitted a revised budget based on

its membership.

Notably, New Horizons requested a significant funding increase of approximately

77%, asking for $725,000, despite currently receiving only $45,000. They justified

their request by citing rising operational costs and the need for additional mobile

response units. Ultimately, the Board could only support an increase of $44,563,

bringing New Horizons' total budget to $450,000.

The Health Department proposed a budget that reflected a 7% increase to support

staffing, amounting to $56,464. The Treasure Coast Department of Juvenile Justice

(DJJ) estimated a 10% increase, while budgets for the Teen Court and Indian River

programs remained unchanged. Anticipated Medicaid changes would increase to

$179,422, or 11.6%, but were closely monitored due to potential federal changes.

The Court Administration budget was one of the most significant increases, totaling

$762,950, representing an 85.2% rise from $895,000 to $1.65 million. The Guardian

ad Litem program saw a modest increase of $2,4113, or 3.7%, while the Victim

Assistance Program received a slight increase of $1,945, or 1.6%. The State

Attorney’s budget decreased by $3,879, or 0.8%, whereas the Public Defender’s

budget increased by $7,128, or 6.7%.

The Medical Examiner’s budget rose by $261,284, reflecting a 32.3% increase

primarily due to salary adjustments. Overall, funding for state agencies was projected

to increase by 22.7%, driven by State Mandates, necessitating the Board's allocation

of the required funds.

11. NON-DEPARTMENTAL

001-110

001-128

001-137

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION

CHILDREN’S SERVICES

SEBASTIAN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA

FELLSMERE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA

25-0727

Attachments: Non Departmental

County Administrator Titkanich presented the non-departmental budgets. For

Economic Development, the budget was managed through a contractual arrangement

with the Chamber, which had seen a reduction over time. The requested amount was

$245,885, reflecting an increase of $7,160 or 3%.

Regarding the Children's Services Grants, he noted that their budget was one year

behind in terms of the revenue used for expenses. For 2024, the budget was set at

$3,058,348, representing an increase of $421,144, totaling $3,479,492, a 13.8%

increase.

Additionally, there were two Community Redevelopment Area (CRA) Agencies. The

County partnered with these municipalities that had established redevelopment

agencies. There was a Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Trust Fund, and the

portion for the City of Sebastian increased by 11.8%, totaling $339,892. For the city

of Fellsmere, the increase was significant, at 81.8%, totaling $119,790.

Chairman Flescher asked if anyone from the public would like to comment on the

Transportation Fund, Emergency Services District, Non-Departmental State

Agencies, or the Non-Departmental portions of the workshop.

Resident John O’Connor requested an explanation regarding the 10% decrease in

operating expenses for the Emergency Services District. Administrator Titkanich

explained that the overall reduction was $1.1 million. Of this amount, $174,000 was

related to expenses from Hurricane Milton. There was also a rollover from the

previous year of $45,000 that would no longer be included. Additionally, building

maintenance costs decreased by $100,000 due to issues that were addressed during

the current fiscal year. Fuel expenses decreased by $13,000 based on recent trends.

He noted that the previous year, the District had purchased hybrid suits, costing

$512,000. Furthermore, supply costs declined by $150,000. Lastly, the PEMT

(Public Emergency Medical Transportation) grant, totaling $318,000, was rolled over

and removed from the budget. All these factors combined accounted for the total

reduction of $1.1 million.

Additionally Mr. O’Connor inquired whether anything had been removed from the

Fire Chief’s proposed budget. Budget Director Kristin Daniels explained that the

most significant change had been a reduction of $4 million in the Capital line. She

noted that while some items had been postponed to a subsequent year, they also had

the option to shift some expenses to an optional sales tax to alleviate the burden on

the tax fund. Therefore, although the budget reflected a decrease, the funds had

simply been reallocated to the optional sales tax rather than being eliminated from the

district budget.

A discussion took place between Steve Aguirre, a resident of Vero Beach Highlands,

and Administrator Titkanich regarding the Emergency Services District. Mr. Aguirre

pointed out that the slide listed an increase of 99.4%, which was likely a typo and

should have been 9.4%. He also mentioned that the section on "other uses" showed a

66.8% increase and asked what the increase was for. Administrator Titkanich

confirmed the misprint and explained that the 66.8% increase was meant for

contingency and transfers. Mr. Aguirre also asked about three new positions in the

Emergency Services District budget, each offering a salary of $121,000.

Administrator Titkanich clarified these roles were for Captains. Although these

positions were included in the budget, they were not funded through the millage rate

because their revenue came from grant funds. As a result, there would be no financial

burden on taxpayers for these three positions, along with two vehicles and their

equipment.

Ms. Daniels noted that the grant allowed for multi-year spending, but it had a finite

total that could be impacted by the pace at which the funds were utilized. There was

some flexibility to cover salaries in the second year, although not for all three

positions, and the District ultimately needed to take on these costs afterward. Looking

ahead to the following year, funding concerns were anticipated to rise, with the

potential for requesting additional funding that remained uncertain. A proposal to

extend the funding over a couple of years was under consideration. The forecast

suggested support for about two and a half years, given the current price levels, even

though the grant had initially been designated for three years.

Matt Redstone, on behalf of the Deputies Association, stated that they stand in

solidarity with the firefighters and support their request for additional pay.

12. NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS

001-110

MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION

UNITED AGAINST POVERTY (fka HARVEST FOOD)

211 PALM BEACH/TREASURE COAST

CTC-SRA-SENIOR SERVICES

25-0728

Attachments: Non Profit

County Administrator Titkanich stated that, according to the funding policy for outside

agencies, increases were capped at 2%, reflecting the Consumer Price Index (CPI)

for April of that year. Although each agency had requested more than a 2% increase,

only a 2% increase was recommended for the upcoming fiscal year.

13. QUASI NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS

001-206

001-110

VETERANS COUNCIL OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, INC.

COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION COORDINATOR (SRA)

COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION COORD. GRANTS (SRA)

GIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER, INC.

PROGRESSIVE CIVIC LEAGUE OF GIFFORD

HUMANE SOCIETY OF VERO BEACH, FL

TREASURE COAST HOMELESS SERVICES COUNCIL, INC.

25-0729

Attachments: Quasi Non Profit

County Administrator Titkanich presented the Quasi-Nonprofit Organizations, starting

with the Veterans Council, which proposed a 10.2% funding increase. The Council

reported an increase in requests for services from the Veterans Association (VA) and

sought additional funding to meet these growing demands. Furthermore, the

Community Transportation Coordinator (SRA) requested a 10.6% increase in

matching funds for grants related to vehicle purchases. The Gifford Youth

Achievement Center was capped at a 2% increase, while the Progressive Civic

League received no increase in funding, remaining at its current level. The Humane

Society sought a 10% increase, which was contingent upon the contract extending

beyond November 2025, based on staff estimates. Lastly, Treasure Coast Homeless

Services had been recommended to receive an additional 5% increase. Although they

initially requested a substantial 38% increase, budget constraints led the County

Administrator to recommend a more modest 5% increase instead.

Chairman Flescher invited anyone from the audience to speak on non-profit

organizations.

Phil Cromer, CEO of the Mental Health Association, expressed his gratitude for the

support received during challenging times marked by economic uncertainty. He

highlighted the rise in anxiety, anger, and depression among individuals, emphasizing

the importance of funding for services in Indian River County. The demand for

psychological services, screenings, and suicide risk assessments increased, and the

association's psychiatric services expanded. Mr. Cromer noted positive outcomes

from implemented initiatives, including zero Baker Acts, indicating improved internal

crisis management and resource savings.

Ty Barnes, CEO of 211 Palm Beach and Treasure Coast, highlighted the

organization's service to Indian River, St. Lucie, Martin, and Okeechobee counties, as

well as the importance of funding for their community impact. Operating a 24/7

helpline focused on suicide prevention and crisis intervention, they provided various

public programs and maintained a comprehensive resource database. In Indian River

County in 2024, they logged over 4,000 community contacts, including 91 related to

suicide, handled 988 National Lifeline calls, and made over 6,100 referrals to other

agencies. Mr. Barnes expressed his gratitude for the continued support.

The Chairman called for a lunch recess at 12:01 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at

1:30 p.m. with all members present. The Budget Workshop continued with Item 18,

Time Certain Public Hearing for the Solid Waste Disposal District.

NON-AD VALOREM ASSESSMENT CHARGES

14. STREETLIGHTING DISTRICTS

179

180

181

182

183

184

186

188

189

190

191

192

193

194

195

196

197

198

199

OCEANSIDE

OSLO PARK

GIFFORD

LAURELWOOD

ROCKRIDGE

VERO HIGHLANDS

PORPOISE POINT

LAUREL COURT

TIERRA LINDA

VERO SHORES

IXORA PARK

ROYAL POINCIANA

ROSELAND ROAD

WHISPERING PINES

MOORINGS

WALKER’S GLEN

GLENDALE LAKES

FLORALTON BEACH

WEST WABASSO

25-0730

Attachments: Streetlights

[Clerk note: This Item was heard following the Solid Waste Disposal District

(SWDD) public hearing]

Commission Moss read aloud the rates for all of the Streetlighting Districts in the

County. All rates remained unchanged except for the following:

Tierra Linda: $55 per parcel acre (increasing to $56, a $1 increase), and Whispering

Pines: $25 per parcel acre (increasing to $31, a $6 increase).

These rates would be in effect for the upcoming fiscal year.

15. OTHER M.S.B.U.

171

EAST GIFFORD STORMWATER M.S.B.U.

VERO LAKE ESTATES M.S.B.U.

North County Water Assessment

185

Other Assessments

25-0731

Attachments: MSBU

Administrator Titkanich presented information on the Municipal Service Benefit Units

(MSBU) and other assessments. For Vero Lake Estates, the MSBU assessment was

$50 per parcel acre. The proposal for fiscal year 2025-2026 was to maintain this rate

at $50. The East Gifford Stormwater MSBU assessment was $10 per parcel acre,

and it was proposed to remain the same for the fiscal year 2025-2026. For the

North County Water Assessment, the current fee was $ 290.53 per parcel acre. The

proposal was to reduce this rate by $7.31, bringing it down to $283.22

16. ENTERPRISE FUNDS

418-221

418-236

441-233

471-218

471-219

471-235

471-257

471-265

471-268

471-269

471-282

471-292

474-235

475-235

GOLF COURSE MAINTENANCE

CLUBHOUSE

BUILDING DEPARTMENT

UTILITIES – WASTEWATER TREATMENT

UTILITIES – WATER PRODUCTION

UTILITIES – GENERAL & ENGINEERING

UTILITIES – SLUDGE OPERATIONS

UTILITIES – CUSTOMER SERVICE

UTILITIES – WASTEWATER COLLECTION

UTILITIES – WATER DISTRIBUTION

UTILITIES – OSPREY MARSH

UTILITIES – SPOONBILL MARSH

UTILITY WATER IMPACT FEES

UTILITY SEWER IMPACT FEES

25-0732

Attachments: Enterprise Funds

Administrator Titkanich presented the Enterprise Funds Budget. The proposed

budget for the golf course was $5,130,104, reflecting a 7.1% increase or $339,655.

This increase was primarily attributed to a rise in the contract for maintaining the

greens, which was set to increase by $219,000.

The proposed budget for the Building Department totaled $7,713,641, representing a

10% increase. This budget included nine new positions proposed for the Building

Division. However, the department managed to reduce supplemental Building

Inspection Services by $500,000 due to the addition of the new in-house positions.

The proposed budget for Utilities was $65,151,757, reflecting a 3.8% decrease. This

decline was mainly due to fluctuations in capital expenses from year to year. The plan

included adding one full-time position and reclassifying another. The Board was aware

that utility rates would increase by 12% starting October 1, 2025. This rate hike,

combined with new growth, was expected to bring in an additional $8.6 million to the

utilities revenue budget.

Lastly, the proposed budget for Water and Sewer impact fees was also presented.

The budget for water impact fees was $876,256, reflecting a decrease of $320,744.

This decrease was due to the fact that this was the first year the impact fees had been

separated into two funds, necessitating adjustments to match actual expenses.

Similarly, the proposed budget for sewer impact fees was $1,109,807, showing a

significant decrease of 29.6%.

17. INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS

501

FLEET MANAGEMENT

502

RISK MANAGEMENT (SELF INSURANCE)

EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE

504

505-103

505-241

IT - GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS

IT - INFORMATION SYSTEMS & TELECOMMUNICATIONS

25-0734

Attachments: Internal Services

County Administrator Titkanich presented the proposed budget for the Internal

Service Fund, highlighting several key areas. The budget for Fleet Management was

set at $4,656,014, reflecting a 1.6% increase primarily due to rising costs for

subcontracted repairs that could not be performed in-house.

The proposed budget for Risk Management/Self Insurance totaled $10,381,272,

representing an 8.5% increase. For the Employee Health Insurance Fund, the

proposed budget totaled $35,202,730, representing a $1,719,082 increase, or 5.1%.

This increase was largely attributed to the rising costs of pharmaceuticals, particularly

those related to GLP-1 medications. Furthermore, a proposal was made to allocate

an additional position in this budget for the upcoming fiscal year.

Lastly, the proposed budget for Information Technology was $7,158,169, indicating

an increase of $931,668, or 15%. This rise was linked to additional software and

hardware expenses expected in the forthcoming fiscal year. Florida's Cybersecurity

Grant could mitigate some of these costs, and was projected to contribute

approximately $450,000, although this amount was subject to variability based on

vendor negotiations. Administrator Titkanich expressed satisfaction that the

consultants had secured this grant during a leadership transition.

Clerk's note: Chairman Flescher paused the Budget workshop for the 1:30 p.m.

Special Call Meeting to discuss the Special Assessment Resolution for the Solid

Waste Disposal District.

The Board of County Commissioners reconvened as the Board of Commissioners for

the Solid Waste Disposal District. The minutes will be approved at an upcoming

Solid Waste Disposal District meeting.

18. 1:30 P.M. (PUBLIC HEARING) SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT (S.W.D.D.)

PROOF OF PUBLICATION FOR THIS HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE

OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD.

411-217

411-255

SANITARY LANDFILL

RECYCLING

25-0735

Attachments: SWDD

County Administrator Titkanich informed the Board that they had previously voted to

adopt Universal Collection. The budget presented incorporated the rates that had

already been approved, excluding the universal collection assessment. Regarding the

landfill, he highlighted a significant budget change resulting from new contracts secured

with Republic Services. The Landfill costs were projected to increase from

$19,804,640 to $32,166,317, representing a $12,361,677 increase, or 62.4%. In

terms of recycling, although the increase was lower at 29.8%, it still indicated a

$3,604,409 increase. Overall, the total expenses for the Solid Waste Disposal District

(SWDD), excluding capital expenses, amounted to $42,047,435, marking a

$13,159,720 increase, or 45.6%. Administrator Titkanich reminded the Board that

the details for Universal Collection had already been approved the Residential and

Commercial Waste Generation Units, along with the Readiness-to-Use fee. For

Universal Collection, the annual assessment was noted to be $181.70.

The Chairman opened the public hearing for comments. There being none, the

Chairman closed the public hearing.

The Board of Commissioners adjourned the Solid Waste Disposal District meeting

and reconvened as the Board of County Commissioners of the Budget workshop

meeting beginning with Item 14, Streetlighting Districts.

19. MISCELLANEOUS FUNDS

102

103

104

108

109

112

117

119

120

121

123

124

127

128

130

133

135

136

137

138

139

140

141

142

145

147

155

TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES

ADDITIONAL IMPACT FEES

TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES 2020

RENTAL ASSISTANCE

SECONDARY ROAD CONSTRUCTION

SPECIAL LAW ENFORCEMENT

TREE ORDINANCE FINES

TOURIST DEVELOPMENT FUND

911 SURCHARGE

DRUG ABUSE FUND

IRCLHAP/SHIP

METRO PLAN ORGANIZATION

NATIVE UPLANDS ACQUISITION

COASTAL ENGINEERING

NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION 3 PLAN

FLORIDA BOATING IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

DISABLED ACCESS PROGRAMS

INTERGOVERNMENTAL GRANTS

TRAFFIC EDUCATION PROGRAM

ARP – AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN

CARES ACT & COVID-19 RESPONSE

COURT FACILITY SURCHARGE FUND

ADDITIONAL COURT COSTS

COURT TECHNOLOGY FUND

LAND ACQUISITION SERIES 2006

OPIOID SETTLTEMENT FUNDS

LAND ACQUISITION SERIES 2024

25-0736

Attachments: Special Revenue

County Administrator Titkanich presented the budget for various Miscellaneous

Funds, highlighting key changes for the upcoming fiscal year. Traffic Improvement

Fees were no longer collected, resulting in a proposed budget of zero. The budget for

Additional Impact Fees decreased to $1,904,483 due to capital project fluctuations.

Traffic Impact Fees saw an increase to $14,691,920 owing to Capital Projects.

Other notable budgets included Rental Assistance, decreased to $3,993,330;

Secondary Road Construction, increased to $8,849,930; and a zero budget for the

Special Law Enforcement Fund. The Tourist Development Fund proposed an

increase to $2,243,900, anticipating a rise in revenues.

Several funds experienced significant changes: the 911 Surcharge Fund decreased to

$1,627,750 due to grant funding, while the SHIP funding was set at $1,950,058,

reflecting a decrease. The Coastal Engineering Fund also saw a reduction to

$10,400,329, and funding for the Disabled Access Programs and Intergovernmental

Grants was proposed at zero.

The Court Facility Surcharge Fund had a slight decrease to $120,824, and the Court

Technology Fund increased to $300,000. Meanwhile, the Opioid Settlement Funding

would be managed through budget amendments due to variability. Lastly, the newly

established Land Acquisition Bond Series 2024 was approved for $24,780,742, with

remaining funds expected to roll into the next fiscal year. Overall, the budget reflected

adjustments resulting from changes in revenue, project completions, and the impact of

grant funding across various funds.

20. DEBT SERVICE/CAPITAL PROJECTS

204

255

308

DODGER BONDS

LAND ACQUSITION BONDS 2024

JACKIE ROBINSON TRAINING COMPLEX

(fka CAPITAL RESERVE FUND)

OPTIONAL ONE-CENT SALES TAX

315

25-0737

Attachments: Debt-Capital Projects

Budget Director Kristen Daniels presented the details of the Debt Service and Capital

Projects budgets. The proposed budget for the Dodger Bonds Fund was $500,000,

which was allocated for the debt service payment funded by the State each fiscal

year.

Next, the Land Acquisition Bond Fund, which covered the debt service for the Land

Acquisition Bond Series 2024 had a budget set at $1,843,432. This amount

accounted for the principal and interest on the bond, referenced earlier, at an annual

rate of 0.061%.

The proposed budget for the Jackie Robinson Training Complex (formerly known as

Dodgertown Capital Reserve) stood at $424,768. This figure represented their lease

obligation for capital maintenance at the Complex, which increased annually in

accordance with the Consumer Price Index (CPI). The increase stemmed from this

adjustment, although they also experienced a decrease due to the funding of extra

projects beyond their typical capital maintenance obligations, which were nearing

completion.

The Optional One-Cent Sales Tax Fund had a proposed budget of $53,870,236,

reflecting a decrease of $34,263,675. This fluctuation was attributed to variances in

capital projects. Any of the outstanding $88,139,911 that remained at the end of the

fiscal year would roll over into the next fiscal year.

The Chairman called for a recess at 1:53 p.m. and reconvened at 2:00 p.m. with all

members present.

21. AGGREGATE MILLAGE

AGGREGATE MILLAGE RATE IS 6.1158.

Administrator Titkanich stated that the proposed Aggregate Millage rate was

6.1198. The rolled back millage rate was 5.7442, while the proposed rate

was 6.1158, resulting in a difference of 0.3716. It was important to note that

this figure represented an average and did not reflect what every individual

would pay.

22. RECAP - TOTAL PROPOSED BUDGET AND PROPOSED MILLAGE RATES

JOHN A. TITKANICH, JR., COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR

25-0738

Attachments: Recap

The discussion between the Board and staff focused on the proposed budget

and the importance of properly advertising the millage rate, as emphasized by

Ms. Daniels. She pointed out the difficulties in not knowing the fund amounts

prior to the preliminary hearing and suggested scheduling an additional

workshop in August for further discussions.

Commissioner Adams noted that the Board was not fully prepared to make

decisions at that moment but was open to holding a special meeting to

address any concerns. Administrator Titkanich recommended reevaluating

certain positions within the General Fund to identify potential savings and

emphasized the need to exercise caution in budget decisions for future years.

He presented a slide showing how the County could potentially achieve a

$6.1 million funding increase for the sheriff by reallocating funds from other

areas, such as: $500,000 from Animal Services funding, $247,507 from the

Facilities Master Plan, $151,994 from Court Administration, $125,000 from

the Gifford Neighborhood Plan, and $240,000 from a mile of road paving.

The goal was to increase the Sheriff's budget request by an additional $1.4

million over the proposed amount.

Commissioner Adams inquired about the removal of certain funds, while Vice

Chairman Loar emphasized the importance of the Gifford Neighborhood

Plan, noting its delays. Administrator Titkanich expressed agreement and

highlighted the value of having an independent consulting team to enhance the

Gifford Neighborhood Plan's effectiveness for the community and the County

overall.

Administrator Titkanich recapped that the proposed overall budget was

$597,623,132, reflecting a decrease of $73,305,111 from the amended FY

24/25 budget. The General Fund millage was set at 3.5475, marking a 6.69%

increase over the rollback rate, which was considered a tax increase by law.

The General Fund budget was proposed at $156,920,503, an increase of

$196,559.

For the unincorporated area, the proposed millage was 1.1506 mills, a 6.09%

increase over the rollback rate. The MSTU budget was proposed at

$54,969,931, showing a decrease of $2,285,375. The Transportation Fund

budget was proposed at $27,295,785, a decrease of $1,386,172.

The Emergency Service District had a proposed millage of 2.3531, a 6.25%

increase over the rollback rate, and its budget was $73,585,471, which was

$9,992,199 less than the previous year. Lastly, the Land Acquisition Bond

Series 2024 proposed millage was 0.0610, and the proposed budget was

$1,843,432, representing an increase of $65,340. Discussions regarding the

proposed millage rates and potential budget changes would be held

individually with the Commissioners.

Chairman Flescher emphasized the importance of being proactive and fiscally

disciplined, taking into account economic concerns and potential revenue

challenges. He noted the need for continued essential services while preparing

for a possible economic downturn. He thanked staff, particularly Kristen

Daniels and Elise Kriss, for their hard work on the budget despite staffing

challenges, as well as other departments and employees for their

contributions. Chairman Flescher also announced the schedule for the

Preliminary Budget Hearing on September 10, 2025, and the Final Budget

Hearing on September 17, 2025, expressing the need to prioritize scheduling

a Special Call August workshop.

A motion was made by Commissioner Earman, seconded by Chairman

Flescher, to approve the proposed millage rates as presented. The

motion carried by the following vote:

5 -

Aye:

Chairman Flescher, Vice Chairman Loar, Commissioner Adams,

Commissioner Earman, and Commissioner Moss

There being no further business the Chairman adjourned the meeting at 4:40 p.m.