September 17, 2024, an estimated 28,374 septic systems were operational in the
County. Mr. Richards analyzed scenarios based on service availability and
connection types and presented the S2S project status. The goal included
connecting 2,613 properties by 2030, with a focus on 582 “quick wins” and
extending sewer services to 259 properties. During the presentation, three cost
elements were covered: public infrastructure, private connections, and customer
service charges. Additionally, various conversion solutions were highlighted,
including three Enhanced Nutrient-Reducing Onsite Sewage Treatment and
Disposal Systems (ENR-OSTDS) approved by the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection (FDEP) for nitrogen reduction. Mr. Richards closed his
presentation with a recap of staff’s recommendations (see Items A-J under
recommended action)
Discussion ensued between the Board and staff regarding the environmental
impacts of moving away from septic systems, particularly the challenges
associated with removing or decommissioning septic tanks. The Board recognized
that these requirements could pose a significant burden on homeowners,
especially those with smaller lots where it was difficult to replace existing systems.
Commissioner Earman stressed the urgency of addressing Lagoon-related issues
and highlighted the financial obstacles associated with mandatory connections.
Vice Chairman Loar underscored the importance of lobbying efforts as the
January 2026 Legislative Session approached, voicing concerns about potential
financial strains on residents. Commissioner Moss raised questions about the
consequences of waiving assessments and permit fees, and it was clarified that
grants would cover 75% of project costs, with the goal of waiving the remaining
25%. Chairman Flescher emphasized the need for a structured plan to help
residents manage compliance costs. Mr. Lieske noted rising infrastructure costs
and indicated that retro-fitting for ENR-OSTDS could cost residents $20,000 to
$25,000. He stressed the urgency for residents who could currently connect to
the sewer system to do so to avoid losing out on grant funding.
The Board recognized the need to secure state grant funding while also
considering residents’ needs and financial limitations. To lessen the financial
burden, various funding options and policy adjustments were debated.
Suggestions included waiving connection and assessment fees for properties that
were already set up for sewer connections, as well as allowing property owners
to connect to the sewer without a water connection. These measures could
significantly cut costs. Mr. Lieske discussed leveraging grants and seeking further
funding to assist residents in making the transition, although concerns arose about
the broader community’s impact if these costs were passed on to other
ratepayers.
The Chairman opened the floor for public comment.