Commissioner Earman inquired about the distinction between members appointed by
the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) and Members-At-Large. He emphasized
that both groups served at the Board's discretion and were voted on collectively. He
also sought clarification on the appointment process and suggested establishing an
application process for these positions. Commissioner Earman proposed waiting 30
days before approving any new members to allow time for additional applications and
to then reconvene in February. He noted ongoing confusion regarding the transitions
of oversight between the County Attorney's office and the BCC office, which needed
to be addressed and documented.
Attorney Shuler reviewed the Resolution that established the Children's Services
Advisory Committee (CSAC). Unlike other Boards that typically have representatives
from each Commissioner and At-Large Members, the CSAC had a different
structure. Seven (7) of the voting members were appointed by the Board of County
Commissioners. The remaining voting members were appointed by their designated
entity. Understanding these distinctions was important for clarifying the committee's
composition and function.
Discussion ensued between the Board and Attorney Shuler and centered on posting
vacancies. There was uncertainty about the appropriateness of listing these since
current committee members would be noted. Instead, the suggestion was to invite
applicants for consideration. Historically, At-Large positions have been filled
indefinitely if no other applicants emerged, but there were concerns from individuals
wanting to apply who felt the position may already be filled. To address this, it would
be wise to postpone decisions and allow more applicants to come forward.
The recommendation was to let current committee members continue their roles for
the time being while also inviting new applications via an announcement on the County
website. The Board could evaluate the committee's composition based on any new
applications received. Additionally, verifying that this strategy aligned with legal
requirements and exploring options for recalling a member, if necessary, after their
appointment was important. This approach would ensure a diverse and capable
committee moving forward. The aim was to create opportunities for new applicants in
the future by not automatically renewing BCC appointees or At-Large positions
without considering others. It was suggested that current positions be left unchanged
for now. Advertise for new applicants, compare them with current members, and
discuss any potential changes at the February 25, 2025 BCC meeting.
A motion was made by Commissioner Adams, seconded by Commissioner Moss,
to table the vote on committee members for the Beach and Shore Preservation
Advisory Committee, Children Services Advisory Committee, Code Enforcement
Board, Construction Board of Adjustment and Appeals, Economic Development
Council, Environmental Control Hearing Board, Planning & Zoning Commission,
and the Tourist Development Council until the February 25, 2025, BCC meeting.