Skip to main content
File #: 25-1024    Version: 1
Type: Department Staff Report Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 10/14/2025 In control: Planning and Development Services
On agenda: 10/23/2025 Final action:
Title: Joint Public Workshop Between the Board of County Commissioners and the Planning and Zoning Commission to Discuss the Planned Development (PD) Review and Approval Process
Indexes: Planned Development
Attachments: 1. Chpt 915 - PD Process and Standards for Development, 2. Nearby Jurisdictions PD Project Size Requirements
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.
TO: Indian River County Board of County Commissioners
Members of the Planning and Zoning Commission

THROUGH: John A. Titkanich Jr., County Administrator

FROM: Ryan Sweeney; Acting Planning & Development Services Director

DATE: October 10, 2025

SUBJECT: Joint Public Workshop Between the Board of County Commissioners and the
Planning and Zoning Commission to Discuss the Planned Development (PD)
Review and Approval Process
__________________________________________________________________

BACKGROUND

The County’s planned development (PD) ordinance (Chapter 915 of the County LDRs; see Attachment 1) was first adopted approximately 35 years ago and has been utilized to review and approve over 50 PD projects. While the PD process also includes commercial PDs, mixed use PDs, and traditional neighborhood design (TND) PDs, most of the PDs that have been approved have been single-family residential PDs. Examples of single-family residential PDs include smaller projects such as Hidden Lake PD (47 lots on 18.92 acres) to some of the County’s largest residential developments like Grand Harbor, Pointe West, and Waterway Village.

Under the County’s current PD process, applicants for PD projects may request waivers (exceptions) from certain development parameters such as minimum lot width, minimum lot size, and setbacks in favor of a creative and cohesive community design. Since the adoption of the County’s PD ordinance, it has been the County’s practice to require PD projects to provide public benefits (sometimes referred to as “trade-offs” in the earlier years) in order to offset the waivers that are being requested by the applicant. Over the past few years, there have been several instances where the balance between the applicant’s requested waivers versus the project’s proposed public benefits has been scrutinized by the PZC, the BCC, and the general public. There have also been instances where the project’s resulting design has been considered pl...

Click here for full text